Search Amway Leaders

Tuesday, July 6, 2021

Crosby, Henry & Pat Amway

 Qualifications

Founders Diamond 2004

Downline Diamond

  • Crosby, Henry & Pat, Founders Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Hughes, Roland & Molly, Founders Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Hall, John & Terri, Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Park, Myung Hyung & Seon Do, Executive Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Kim, Seung Ho & Hyun Ja & Jae, Crown Ambassador, United States, InterNET
  • Im, Steve & Shanna, Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Grant, Leo & Amy, Double Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Moss, Robert & Roberta, Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Ledbetter, Curtis & Virginia, Double Diamond, United States, InterNET / TeamBuilders
  • Ledbetter, Lennon & Suzanne, Double Diamond, United States, InterNET / TeamBuilders
  • Donovan, John & Julie, Diamond, United States, InterNET
  • Metcalf, David & Karalee, Emerald, United States, InterNET / TeamBuilders
  • Romanillo, Rigoberto & Yadira, Diamond 2010, United States, InterNET / TeamBuilders

Crosby, Henry & Pat


Pappalardo, Vinny & Dayna Amway

 Qualifications

  • Diamond 2008
  • Executive Diamond 2013
  • Crown 2018

Vinnie Pappalardo owned and operated a large retail furniture store in New York for 16 years until unforeseen circumstances forced him to close the store and lose everything. 

When he was first introduced to the Quixtar® business opportunity, he was working three jobs seven days a week, and he was exhausted. 

He recognised the opportunity right away as a way to get back into business for himself with a low initial outlay of capital.

Even though he was enthusiastic about the Quixtar business opportunity, his wife, Dayna, wasn't as enthusiastic. 

She was concerned that the Plan would add yet another burden to her already overburdened schedule, as were many others who first saw it. 

Dayna, on the other hand, quickly realised that the rewards were directly proportional to the amount of effort put forth, and she decided to stay with the company.

They are now completely debt-free thanks to the success of their Quixtar business, which provides them with their sole source of income. 

Even better, they believe they have more time to spend with their children and grandchildren, and they look forward to passing their business on to future generations of their family members.
Pappalardo, Vinny & Dayna

Leininger, Alan & Michele Amway

 Qualifications

  • Diamond 1996
  • Founders Diamond

Success Story

Alan and Michele were both born and reared in Cincinnati, Ohio, and met when they were 16 years old. They have been together ever since. 

He and Alan proceeded to the same high school, where Alan graduated as class valedictorian, and then they both went on to study at Ohio State University in Columbus.

Alan finished with honours with a degree in electrical engineering and a pre-medical concentration, and Michele graduated with a bachelor's degree in information technology.

The following year was frantic, beginning with graduation in June, followed by marriage in July, and then a move to Raleigh, North Carolina, in August. 

Alan then had his first engineering job, as well as his first corporate layoff, all within a short period of time. 

Michele had accepted a position with IBM and was immediately dispatched to Chicago for a ten-week training programme.

Alan and Michele realised at that point that they did not want anybody else to have control over their lives, and they made the decision to create their own business. 

Alan, on the other hand, began medical school at the University of North Carolina in the same year, pursuing his childhood dream of becoming a neurosurgeon at the institution. 

He was also looking for a greater sense of security and a greater challenge than he had found in his technical profession. 

After only a few months, Alan realised that his "part-time" firm had more to offer than he had anticipated, and he decided to drop out of medical school and take another engineering position in order to devote his time and energy to growing their company.

A year later, they found out they were expecting their first child. According to Michele's childhood ambitions, "my dream was never to be a computer programmer; it was always to be a mother.

" Their sense of urgency had now been heightened, and Alan recalls, "The more she showed, the more I showed (the business plan)."

A white stretch limousine carried Michele away from her job only weeks before the birth of their daughter, Laurin, and two years later, a white stretch limousine whisked Alan away from his job, allowing him to focus entirely on growing his business. 

Their second daughter, Kristin, and their son, Aaron, were born while they were on their way to achieving success, and their second son, Joshua, was born shortly after.

Having a fantastic time growing up with their children is something they cherish. In Alan's words, "we don't take vacations because every day is a vacation when you're living in freedom in a free country." Alan and Michele are currently residing in their 6,000-square-foot dream home on more than three acres of land in the countryside.

They regard their business as a means of not just achieving their own goals, but also of assisting others in achieving their own goals. 

They both agree that "if you pursue something you love, you'll never have to work a day in your life."
Leininger, Alan & Michele


MYTH: Saturation Amway

MYTH: Saturation Amway

  •  This concept would be hypothetically possible if the market was static (i.e. one, where new people aren't born). 
  • In reality, each market is dynamic and new people are born each year. 
  • Therefore, the people who are sponsored today are mostly those who couldn't have been sponsored in the beginnings of the business.
  •  Similarly, people who will join the business decades later will talk to and sponsor completely different group of people than most of the recent distributors sponsor right now.
  •  Saturation, which happened to be one of the key points in F.T.C.
  •  vs. Amway, has not been shown to be the case with companies such as Amway.[1]

Example

In 2000, according to the 2000 Census Indiana had 2,336,306 households.

  •  In theory, each of these could form an independent business.
  •  To take into account required retail sales (50 pv a month) to qualify for bonuses on downline volume, this could yield 1,168,153 Independent Business Owners.
  •  According to the 6-4-2 plan approved in 1999, this would yield 14,786 Platinum qualifiers, each of which would add between $50-60K to their family income (ncluding the $20,000 Q12 bonus).
  •  At this point, no new growth is possible in Indiana; 100% of households are either IBOs or customers. 
  • Those who have not reached Platinum level never will, until household fission and population growth yields new households.
  • Now, numbers have been suggested by long-time distributors that only 30% of the population is at any given time willing to consider a business such as this,
  •  which shrinks the pool of households available to this calculation to a much smaller number; 
  • however, it has also been observed that many people who decline the opportunity once will often reconsider in the future.

Reality-based Observations

  • In actuality, over the course of 50 years market saturation has not been a problem for Amway Global.
  •  Its products have achieved little name recognition among most consumers in the US, although the Amway name itself may be wider-known. There are several reasons why market saturation has not been reached:
  • Inactivity of many Independent Business Owners.
  •  The definition of an "active" IBO according to the Corporation is one that bought an item, attempted to sell an item or showed the compensation plan once in the past year.
  •  Many people who start their own business have to "incubate" over time, some for a number of years. However, "incubators" also are not likely to renew.
  •  One study cited by Joe Pici indicated that $82 a month income was all it took to keep the dream alive long enough for a typical incubator to become engaged. However, for a new business owner it often takes being engaged to earn that money.
  •  If a distributor is contributing a few PV each month to his upline's organization but not himself growing, then his upline is not seeing geometric growth and neither is he.
  • Repeat IBOs. Many who become successful and productive have tried Amway before but dropped out for one reason or another.
  •  Some cite lack of effective leadership in their line of sponsorship, some cite problems with family or friends, some simply say that they weren't ready to change what they needed to change to get the results they wanted.
  •  For example, Bobby Britt, brother of Bill Britt of BWW, has talked about how it took being sponsored by Bill three times for him to figure out the Amway system-- and also to convince him to change his habits to see the rewards of his work.
  •  However, that means that now- productive IBOs could be considered part of the earlier growth of another's organization.
  •  This "recycling" of distributors actually makes the system more efficient by concentrating growth in the hands of those more experienced though otherwise considered "new."
  •  However, it also works against the ideal of geometric growth.
  •  Those most likely to succeed are those who failed before as they have struggled already with what is necessary to develop a successful business.
  • International versus Domestic Growth. Much of the growth of Amway Global in recent years has taken place outside of the United States.
  •  Operating in over 90 countries and territories, a given distributor is not bound by geography to a given market. Most large organizations seem to have portions in other countries.
  •  Therefore, the potential of the above example in Indiana as a closed system is simply false.

Immigration.

  •  Amway is not in all countries; it requires a solid domestic infrastructure and relatively stable markets and governments to operate.
  •  For example, although China and India are two of the most significant markets for Amway Global, the fastest population growth is currently happening in African nations where Amway Global does not operate.
  •  However, those that emigrate to other nations can become Amway distributors in that market.
  •  Thus, even refugee crises can in theory aid the growth of Amway Global, constantly bringing new distributors into the network and enabling them to build a better future for themselves and their families.
  • Organic Population Growth. World population has not decreased in the past 200 years and there is no reason to expect that it will decrease any time soon.
  •  There will always be more households through birth and fissioning of existing households, which increases the potential market for growth according to the 6-4-2 plan.

References

  •  F.T.C. vs. Amway - Saturation
MYTH: Saturation Amway


MYTH: Amway is a Pyramid Amway

MYTH: Amway is a Pyramid Amway

 The article is still being worked on.

Pyramid Schemes, also known as Pyramid Selling, Pyramid Games, Illegal Pyramids, and Pyramid Scams, are illegal in almost every country on the planet, and for good reason: they are mathematically doomed to fail and are little more than a way of transferring money from a large group of people to a smaller group of people.

 Their main feature is that you earn money by recruiting others to join the scheme; but, if no more people join, the plan will collapse, leaving those who were the last to join out of pocket.

Examples

  • AirPlane Game
  • One example is the infamous aeroplane game of the 1980s. 
  • People were encouraged to buy tickets as passengers on an imaginary aeroplane.
  • The plane would have 8 passengers, 4 flight attendants, 2 co-pilots, and a pilot. 
  • The Pilot would collect all the ticket money, and afterwards the 2 co-pilots would separate into 2 new planes, taking the roles of pilot, with the flight attendants becoming co-pilots, and the passengers flight attendents.
  •  The flight attendents would then be responsible for recruiting new passengers. 
  • The game would eventually "collapse" when there are no more people willing to pay their $1500 to buy a "ticket". [1]

Product Based Pyramid Schemes

  • More sophisticated pyramid schemes operate in much the same way, except that instead of a ticket on an imaginary aeroplane, participants receive some kind of product or service in return for the cash they put into the scheme.
  •  The products and services however, have little intrinsic worth. 
  • Participants then receive a payment for each additional person they bring in to the scheme.
  •  The products/services are essentially worthless;
  •  participants do not use or consume them themselves, do not reorder them, and have no possibility of selling them to others;
  •  thus there is no way to earn money after joining except through recruiting of others into the scheme. Eventually there will be no further people able to be recruited, and the scheme collapses.

Laws regarding Pyramid Schemes

United States

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with individual states, is responsible for policing illegal marketing schemes in the United States.

Definition of a Pyramid Scheme

  • In 1998, Debra Valentine of the United States Federal Trade Commission, had the following to say about Pyramid Schemes -
  • Pyramid schemes now come in so many forms that they may be difficult to recognise immediately. 
  • They do, however, all have one thing in common
  • . They promise large profits to consumers or investors based primarily on recruiting others to join their programme, rather than profits from actual investments or sales of goods to the general public.
  •  Some schemes claim to sell a product, but the product is often just a ruse to conceal the pyramid structure.
  •  Inventory loading and a lack of retail sales are two telltale signs that a product is being used to hide a pyramid scheme .[2]

The United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit stated in Webster vs Omnitrition[3]:

A test has been established by the Federal Trade Commission to determine what constitutes a pyramid scheme. Participants pay money to the company in exchange for (1) the right to sell a product and (2) the right to receive rewards for recruiting other participants into the programme that are unrelated to the sale of the product to end users.

"As is obvious, the presence of this second element, recruitment with rewards unrelated to product sales, is nothing more than an elaborate chain letter device in which individuals who pay a valuable consideration with the expectation of recouping it to some degree via recruitment are bound to be dispirited" .[3]

The key feature, indeed a necessary feature, of an illegal pyramid scheme in the United States is that participants receive payments when they recruit other participants, as defined by the legal term sine qua non.

Union européenn

The EU parliament passed the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in 2005, which went into effect on December 12, 2007[4] throughout the EU and required member states to outlaw a variety of practises, including Pyramid Schemes.

14. Creating, operating, or promoting a pyramid promotional scheme in which a consumer pays a fee in exchange for the chance to receive compensation based on the introduction of new consumers to the scheme rather than the sale or consumption of products .

In a pyramid promotional scheme, as in the United States, participants are compensated primarily by introducing others to the scheme; however, the directive explicitly considers the possibility of legitimate schemes with participants who are also consumers of the products.

United Kingdom of Great Britain

The Office of Fair Trading and the Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform (BERR), formally known as the Department of Trade & Industry, enforce the Fair Trading Act, as amended by the Trading Schemes Act 1996 and the Trading Schemes Regulations 1997[6]. (DTI).

According to the website of the Office of Fair Trading,

Pyramid schemes are unlawful, and they are'money-making' clubs that claim you can earn a lot of money by recruiting new members once you pay a fee, but only the top gain money, and the schemes always collapse, leaving you out of cash.

Pyramid schemes do not create new money; instead, an infinite supply of new members would be required for everyone to receive the money on offer, which is impossible. As a result, these schemes must eventually fail, resulting in the majority of members losing their money .[6]

According to the BERR website:

* Dealing schemes become illegitimate and unlawful when, despite claiming to give business possibilities, the only purpose of the programme is to gain money by recruiting additional participants rather than trading in products or services, a practise known as "pyramid selling."

* "Pyramid schemes" include a wide range of fake programmes that do not claim to trade in products or services but are recognised as "pyramid schemes," such as chain letters or games.

* In order for everyone to profit, all of these false schemes require an unending supply of new participants; yet, because the supply will always be finite, the pyramid will eventually fall, and most participants will lose their money .[7]

The main characteristic of "pyramid selling" is that money is generated through the recruitment of new participants rather than through the exchange of goods or services.

Australia

The Commonwealth Trade Practices Act 1974, which is enforced by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), covers Pyramid Schemes in Australia. Section 65AAD of the Trade Practices Act[8] states:

A "pyramid selling scheme" is one that has both of the following features:

(a) Some or all new participants must make a payment (a participation payment ) to another participant or participants in the scheme in order to participate in the scheme;

(b) the participation payments are entirely or largely induced by the promise made to new participants that they will be entitled to a payment (a recruitment payment) in exchange for bringing in more new participants to the scheme .[8]

What the ACCC has to say about Pyramid Sales Schemes[9] -

  • People typically pay to join and are promised a commission for introducing others; this appears to be an appealing investment with the potential to generate a large sum of money later on, but participants frequently lose their initial investment
  • If a proposal includes financial incentives for recruiting people, it could be considered an illegal pyramid scheme.
  • * offers of low-cost or low-value goods or services made solely to promote the schem
  • * a one-time financial outlay to buy large quantities of goods, or
  • * There are no goods or services for sale.
  • A necessary feature of an illegal pyramid selling scheme in the United States, as well as elsewhere in the world, is the provision of financial incentives for recruiting people to the scheme.
  • New Zealand is a country in the Pacific Ocean.
  • The Fair Trading Act, which is enforced by the Commerce Commission in New Zealand, covers Pyramid Schemes. The Fair Trading Act - A General Guide[10] states:
  • A pyramid scheme can take many different forms, but it must include the following elements
  • * it provides a financial return based on new recruit payments;
  • * the return is dependent primarily on the continued recruitment of new members, not sales of a product or service.[10] .[10]

Commonalties

Clearly, anti-pyramid laws around the world all have a common thread - you earn income through recruiting others into the scheme. If recruiting stops, the income stops. If nobody else can be recruited, the most recent recruits cannot recoup their investment.

Multi-level Marketing

In legitimate multi-level marketing businesses, income is not earned through recruiting, it is instead earned through the sale of legitimate products to legitimate consumers. If 1000 people are recruited, and no products are sold, no income is earned. Conversely, if no people are recruited, but products are sold, then income is earned. Like any business, the income is based on the sale of goods and services, not on recruiting others into the "scheme".

Unfortunately commentators often confuse the marketing strategy of recruiting others as a method to increase product volume with illegal pyramids goal of recruiting others in order to receive compensation for the recruitment. The goal of an illegal pyramid is to recruit as many people as possible. The goal of multi-level marketing is to increase the sale of goods and services as much as possible.

Why the focus on recruiting in Network Marketing?

One word - leverage. Industrialist John D. Rockefeller reportedly said "I would rather earn 1 percent off a 100 people's efforts than 100 percent of my own efforts."[11]

"Recruiting" in Network Marketing is essentially done for the same reason a clothing store might employ more staff or open an additional outlet - to increase sales volume through leveraging the time of othe

Pyxis Innovations Inc Amway

Pyxis Innovations Inc Amway

 Starting in 2003, Alticor purchased a controlling interest in Interleukin Genetics (currently 58 percent) as part of its long-term vision to be able to offer personalised health solutions and products, particularly nutrition and supplementation, that are customised or 'personalised' to each person's needs.

Genetics of Interleukin

  • A personalised health company that focuses on genetics.
Pyxis Innovations Inc Amway

Gurwitch Products Amway

Gurwitch Products Amway

 Laura Mercier Cosmetics, a global brand of high-end cosmetics, skincare, body and bath, is produced, managed, and marketed by Gurwitch Products. Laura Mercier, which was founded in 1996 and is situated in Houston, Texas, has over 650 doors in 24 countries.

Alticor owns a majority of Gurwitch, and Janet Gurwitch is the company's CEO, succeeding co-founder Gary Kusin, who has moved on to become the CEO of Kinko's. The company's annual sales are over $120 million.

On May 1st, 2008, Gurwitch Products purchased RéVive Skincare, a premium skincare line, and related assets from Bays-Brown Laboratories.

Gurwitch Products Amway


Most Popular