Let us explore more information about What Is The WWDB Eagle Program? in this post.
A frequent site visitor has inquired about the existence of "Eagle" parameters on several occasions and has expressed scepticism about the existence of such parameters. Now, I'm not sure if WWDB still offers this programme, but I believe they do because I've heard from a few new IBOs who have expressed interest in achieving Eagle status. While Eagle may appear to IBOs as a sort of "winner's club," I believe that the Eagles are mostly responsible for the bulk of the revenue generated by the lines of sponsorship, which is likely why this programme was established in the first place. The following are the general specifics:
- Upline Diamond has received a signed Counsel Sheet.
- Couples can get 300 PV for personal use/retail, while singles can get 200 PV for personal use/retail.
- 6-5-3 (PB/SO/MF) - This is explained further below.
- 6 legs with a PV rating of 100 or higher
- 5 legs are on a waiting list.
- 3 legs are required to attend significant functions.
More information can be found at Amquix info: http://www.amquix.info/pdfs/wwdb eagle.pdf
This is the Eagle programme, by the way. Given the fact that the majority of IBOs are only able to support a single downline, it is clear that Eagle is a relatively elite club. Most families, however, would be unable to transfer that much personal volume for the expense of 300 or 200 PV ($900 or $600), depending on their financial situation. Of course, you can make money selling the product, but my upline placed a greater emphasis on personal use rather than sales.
Along with the PV, you have 5 legs on standby and 3 legs travelling to significant functions (I'm from Hawaii, so this is a big deal for me). The Eagle programme generated a great deal of income for upline, but not always for the IBO who was in charge of the Eagle parameters. It is possible to be an Eagle yet not have 2500 PV on your computer. A framework like this, on the other hand, maybe profitable even if the tools are not present. However, I have never heard of someone being praised for their efforts in selling Amway items.
The eagle programme, on the other hand, is one that is designed to assure optimum profitability for the upline diamond, rather than the IBO. That alone conveys a great deal.
A sample letter to FTC by an WWDB Eagle
Dear Federal Trade Commission, We are Ken and Kim Holland, and we live in Glendale, AZ. For the past four years, my wife and I have worked as Quixtar Independent Business Owners (IBOs) within the WorldWide Dream Builders (WWDB) mentorship programme.
Our ultimate goal was, and continues to be, financial independence (the Diamond level). There are five steps to getting to Diamond. We've completed the first (Eagle) and are on our way to completing the second (Double Eagle).
All we do is demonstrate to people how they can save money by purchasing through the Quixtar portal, or how they can earn money by demonstrating to others how to do the same thing. It has been extremely beneficial to our family as a result of listening to some of the world's top leaders lecture on how to become better beings during the majority of our business hours.
In a nutshell, WWDB teaches us how to DO every day with the Quixtar business vehicle what is talked about in churches. This has been a tremendous benefit, perhaps even more significant than the financial compensation. Since the beginning, we have had access to the best WWDB mentors on the planet (at no cost), as well as a 100 percent money-back guarantee on all of our products.
We were promised that if we worked hard and consistently (followed the 9 Core steps), we would be able to reach Diamond status. Nothing but the opportunity to succeed was promised to us. We were supplied with all of the information and assistance that we required in order to make an informed decision, and we have done the same for every prospective client of ours.
Prospects spend approximately $130 to register in Quixtar as an IBO (Independent Business Owner). We do not receive any compensation for enrolling anyone. If they decide to leave, we simply refund their money and wish them well in their future endeavours.
We have a number of reservations about the new FTC regulations. The most significant are as follows: One of the requirements is a seven-day waiting period. The majority of prospects have already invested far more time than seven days in deciding whether or not to register.
It would be completely illogical to tell them that they must wait another 7 days in order to comply with a government requirement. It would also have a significant negative impact on their ability to sponsor anyone else into their company in the future.
In the end, this would have the effect of greatly reducing the capacity of anyone to make money in the direct sales industry. Prospects who register with us already have 30 days to request a refund of their registration fees.
Furthermore, at the time of registration, individuals are given literature that explicitly specifies that they are under no obligation to buy or do anything if they do not like to do so. Solution: Remove the waiting time, at the very least for chances like Quixtar, where a prospect can get his money back if he is not completely satisfied. Secondly, the necessity to produce references. Prospects that are interested in joining another IBO might choose me if I could give them with such a list. As the one who initiated contact with the prospect, this does not seem fair to me, especially given the fact that I was the one who initiated contact.
For another thing, since most new IBOs are unfamiliar with other IBOs, it is unlikely that they will be able to produce such a reference list for their prospective clients. It would also breach the privacy of the other IBOs, as it would provide strangers (my prospects) with their personal information (names, addresses, phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and so on) on how to contact them.
Before and after registration, all prospects are provided with several possibilities to network with other Independent Business Owners (IBOs) affiliated with our own line of sponsorship. It is absolutely up to them whether or not they want to do so. Solution - Do away with the necessity to provide references altogether.
In addition, it is necessary to supply a "Litigation List." In this strange requirement, who exactly is the seller that is being referred to? I would be compelled to detail all of the litigation (with or without merit) that has ever been related with Quixtar or other IBO's if the "seller" is an IBO.
Quixtar is owned by Alticor, a company that has been in business for 50 years and already has one of the best reputations on the planet, as you are aware if you have done your research. A corporation like Quixtar, with that kind of long-term reputation in the worldwide business community, should, in my opinion, be sufficient in and of itself. Quixtar IBO's being asked by the FTC to furnish a "Litigation List" would be analogous to someone attempting to save a dying person being required to first provide that dying person with a "Litigation List" for the company/profession that the person represents. If the Federal Trade Commission wishes to impose such requirements, make certain that they are also imposed on every recruiter — and on every corporation in America — before they are permitted to hire anyone. Solution - Remove the obligation for corporations like Alticor/Quixtar to disclose past litigation, at the very least for those companies.
Specific Earnings Disclosures are required under Section 4. As part of our onboarding process, we offer prospects with an FTC-approved document (previously known as the SA-4400, but now known as the Business Overview), which indicates the predicted income of an IBO who consistently performs the needed duties.
The majority of prospects found it to be interesting and extremely detailed at this point. The SA-4400 definition of a "Active IBO" and the "Average monthly gross income" for the same are included in the Overview as well as the FTC phrasing for the same.
It makes no sense to make it even more complicated by including any additional details. People come into business and establish their businesses because they have a dream and a team of mentors who are eager to assist them in achieving that dream.
You suffocate them with as many minor details as you possibly can, and you steal their dream and their team. Solution — Remove the obligation for specific earnings disclosures from the law altogether. Other than the WWDB, require a simple, standard, clearly understood disclosure such as "average monthly gross income for 'active' IBOs" if additional disclosures for Quixtar organizations other than the WWDB are required. In addition, there is a demand for financial justification. Even though this is rare, when someone inquires as to how much I make in the Quixtar business, I inform them of both my own earnings as well as what others make in the Quixtar industry. My affiliation with WWDB has also significantly enhanced my marriage, my association, and myself as a person. It has also helped me become a better citizen of this country through my work with them.
For more over three decades, WWDB has had a divorce rate of less than 2 percent. My company has already assisted a working mother in returning home to raise her own children (this was her dream), which has proven to be invaluable to her, her four children, and my wife and me. It would be intrusive and unethical for the Federal Trade Commission to demand me to give prospects with anything as simple as tax papers to establish my Quixtar revenue.
If I accepted a position with someone, the Federal Trade Commission does not obligate that employer to do the same for me. Employees are just told what they can expect in terms of salary, and that is it. There is no such thing as "financial justification." Solution - Independent business owners (IBOs) should be able to provide proof for any claim they make, but they should not be obligated to do so unless required to do so by the Federal Trade Commission or analogous state authorities as part of an agency inquiry. Sincerely, Ken Holland is a well-known figure in the world of sports.
0 comments: