When some Amway apologists talked about gazing at the "fruit on the tree," I had a big chuckle in my stomach. One critic stated that his parents were in financial trouble and that he turned to his diamond since the diamond appeared to have fruit on the tree. I considered this viewpoint, and I agree that perhaps we should take a closer look at the fruit on the tree. During my previous LOS, WWDB, I seen diamonds get divorced, have their homes foreclosed, go bankrupt, and some even leave WWDB in search of greener fields. That is some serious fruit, to say the least.
Individual business owners (IBOs) and Amway prospects should ask their upline platinum or diamond to show them the fruit on their tree. Inquire about their (company) financial statements by contacting them. In reality, this is a regular practise in the world of business. Before selling his company a few years ago, a buddy of mine prepared three years' worth of income tax returns to be shown to potential purchasers of the company. In the event if your upline avoids the subject or tells you to mind your own business, red flags should appear all over the place.
As far as I'm aware, not a single major pin has ever shared its financial statements with investors. Why wouldn't they want to "display their fruit" if it made particular larger pins appear more attractive? They have no qualms about flashing diamond rings, designer outfits, sports automobiles, and other such adornments. What many independent business owners (IBOs) fail to recognise is that flashy automobiles and other gadgets are not proof of fruit on the tree. Diamonds may be in debt, and they may not even own some of the items that they flaunt around.
It has been suggested that some diamonds may rent luxury vehicles or mansions in order to give the impression that they own these assets. Some diamonds, maybe many diamonds, in the past have misled or embellished the facts about paying in cash for everything, including their homes and automobiles, according to reports. They have also given the appearance to the audience that these luxuries were all purchased with Amway income, despite the fact that we know that many gems were presumably purchased with additional income from the systems or other business activities outside of the Amway organisation.
We are also aware that some gems are in debt, but they are only attempting to depict a lavish lifestyle. The book Amway Motivational Organizations, Behind the Smoke and Mirrors by Ruth Carter is a good resource for more information. Despite the fact that some gems earn a considerable salary, this does not imply that they are financially independent or able to live the jetset lifestyle that many portray. It is possible that the ability to attract new prospects into the firm is a deluding illusion.
So, certainly, let us see the fruit on the tree for what it's worth. Most likely, the tree has been stripped of its leaves.
The result of the Amway business opportunity is sometimes referred to as "the Amway Fruit," which is a term that has been used to characterize the result. Opponents of the Amway business believe that the Amway Fruit is a source of disappointment and failure, while proponents of the Amway business argue that the Amway Fruit is a source of financial freedom and success.
On the one hand, proponents of the Amway business refer to the achievements of successful Amway distributors who have developed prosperous enterprises and attained financial independence as a result of their participation in the company. They contend that the Amway business gives individuals with a one-of-a-kind opportunity to grow their own businesses with the assistance of a well-established organization and a tried-and-true business model, and that this opportunity is only available through the Amway business.
Critics, on the other hand, contend that the Amway Fruit is more often than not a source of disappointment and failure. They contend that the Amway company is constructed on a defective economic model that depends more on the recruitment of new distributors than it does on the sale of actual products. Because of this, the vast majority of Amway distributors are unable to generate a substantial income from their Amway businesses, and many of them actually wind up incurring financial losses as a result.
The company of Amway is also accused of having high amounts of pressure and dishonesty, which is another criticism leveled against it. Distributors are frequently encouraged to make significant financial investments in the company, with the promise of easy and rapid returns on their money. However, the truth is frequently quite different, and many distributors discover that it is quite difficult for them to generate any kind of profit at all.
In addition, the products that are offered by Amway are typically more expensive than comparable products that are available through traditional retail channels. This makes it harder for distributors to sell products and create a client base in the Amway business model. Because of this, distributors are put in a position where the only way for them to make a big revenue is through the recruitment of new distributors rather than through the sale of actual products.
In conclusion, the term "Amway Fruit" is contentious since it is used to represent the result of participating in the Amway business opportunity. Critics of the Amway business contend that it is characterized by disappointment and failure, while supporters of the Amway business refer to the success stories of top distributors as evidence of the business's viability. In the end, the choice of whether or not to become engaged in the Amway business should be given great consideration, with the potential downsides as well as upsides being taken into account.
0 comments: