Amway attracts a large number of people who are not aware of it. Many uplines instruct their followers to respond to a question with another question, such as "What does sucked in mean?" It simply means that they pique a prospect's interest and then use a sales pitch to close the deal. They assert that they have discovered the key to early retirement and untold wealth.
It is absolutely essential for many young people or people who are still working and far from retirement, to believe that there is a magic shortcut to retirement and financial freedom available. Upline leaders, on the other hand, are wise to point out that Amway is not a get-rich-quick scheme. Some even claim that Amway is a "get rich slowly" company. That is done in order to deceive the general public and dispel the notion that it is too good to be true. It has a pleasant ring to it.
Some diamonds, on the other hand, believe that it is best to build it right the first time in 2-5 years. It appears to be straightforward and straightforward. Just look for the number six, as the saying goes. And then they claim to have the secret, which you can gain access to if you just subscribe to their standing orders and show up at all of their meetings. Isn't it simple?
No, not at all. This is the point at which they entice you in. There is a strong desire in you to believe that someone possesses the key to retiring in 2-5 years with enough money to last the rest of your life. What IBOs and prospects aren't seeing are tough questions that force the diamonds to back up their claims with evidence. Diamonds appear to never retire, despite the fact that they claim to be doing so in essence.
Why haven't I been able to identify a single person who was responsible for creating Amway and walking away with untold wealth for life? Why are IBOs unable to identify anyone who has committed this crime? Surely someone will have realised their ambition and desired to retire in peace and quiet with a substantial sum of money? However, IBOs and diamonds are unable to identify any of these diamonds, most likely due to the fact that they do not exist. Please feel free to disprove my assertions.
0 comments: