One of the things that IBO leaders do quite frequently in their recruitment pitch for Amway is to disparage other people's occupations and positions. They are critical of people's bosses as well as the notion that an employee must report to work in order to earn a living. They make an attempt to convey a picture of a job that is comparable to slavery. They do this, according to reports, in order to make people feel uncomfortable with their current status, in the hopes that they will be more receptive to considering the Amway possibility as a method of making a living.
So I'll ask: What exactly is wrong with having a job? A job is not the same as slavery. People seek for jobs and agree to be compensated with a pay or salary in exchange for the services they provide. Certain skills and knowledge can be leveraged to get a better pay or compensation. For example, being able to work in the construction industry can help you earn a higher salary. A job typically provides more benefits than merely a salary. A job frequently include the availability of benefits such as medical insurance, a 401K retirement plan, and other perks such as vacation and/or sick leave, among other things.
A recent site visitor expresses dissatisfaction with the concept of working for minimum wage, stating that a husband and wife would make in the area of $30,000 if they both worked full time at minimum wage for the same company. A high school kid can earn minimum wage, and two adults who are only able to generate that level of money leads me to believe that my site visitor is referring to persons who have little to offer a potential employer in terms of skills and experience. Most people begin their careers as entry-level employees, but as they gain more experience and become more valuable to their employers, their earnings increase.
What is it like to be an Amway business owner on a typical day? Is $115 a month in income (which is undoubtedly well above the national average) sufficient? Generally speaking, according to "the plan," most IBOs earn approximately $9 a month, and they may have expenses such as standing orders that may detract from that meagre return. As a result, an ordinary business developing IBO will incur a net loss. It is really simple to look at the numbers and get to that conclusion.
As a result, I inquire once more. What exactly is wrong about having a job? You make a net profit each and every month, which allows you to pay for your living needs while also making a contribution to society through the payment of taxes. The ordinary CORE IBO is a drain on the tax-paying society in the United States because they spend money on standing orders and functions and then deduct these expenses when they file their taxes. The only ones who profit from this scheme are the upline leaders who sell standing orders and event tickets. So, what exactly is wrong with a 9-to-5 job?
0 comments: