There is a general consensus among Amway supporters that the company has improved and that things are better these days. Surprisingly, it does not appear that IBOs are making any more money. IBO earnings are still low, according to the most recent income declarations from Amway, even after eliminating members who did nothing. So, what has truly changed since then?
Maybe Amway's (de facto) surveillance of the tool groups made a difference. That is a stretch for me because I am still a subscriber to the blogs of current IBOs, and the stuff they provide suggests that little has changed in the intervening time. Diamonds continue to exaggerate their level of achievement, fortune, and lifestyle. Many diamonds, I believe, are living in debt rather than in luxury, as evidenced by their tax filings, which we might study if we wanted to. And, after all, why not? Why would diamonds be any different from the rest of the world's population?
Some people consider Amway's expansion to be a sign of the company's success. However, much of that achievement has come from outside of the United States, and the country still bears the Amwat stigma. Despite the fact that I have not been prospected in a while, I continue to read accounts about recritment scams and shenanigans used by IBOs. How has Amway improved? What exactly have they accomplished? The attrition rate among IBOs continues to be significant. Products are still not competitive in the marketplace. Despite the fact that Amway has different restrictions on IBOs, IBOs continue to be unable to freely travel and sell their items. Individuals are still earning nothing or incurring losses as a result of their use of tools and equipment. Where has the progress been made?
One thing that has improved, in my opinion, is that Amway the corporation continues to generate substantial profits. However, such success does not trickle down to the company's sales staff. And that, after all, is the bottom line, isn't it. IBOs can promote Amway to their hearts' content. Amway's success is a boon for the company, not for independent business owners (IBOs).
0 comments: