Many Independent Business Owners (IBOs) and Amway supporters believe that their method is effective. As far as I am aware, there is no independent proof that the system is effective. In general, the system consists of a website, voicemail, standing orders, seminars or functions, as well as meetings to demonstrate the strategy, among other components. Amway supporters will assert that nearly everyone who succeeds does so because of the system, but they will fail to mention that everyone who succeeds also has hundreds, if not thousands, of downlines who do not succeed, even after making a sincere effort to build their businesses using the system in the first place.
A math professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.) named Edward O. Thorpe researched and produced a theory on blackjack, concluding that it was mathematically possible for a blackjack player to have an edge over the house in the game of blackjack. Casinos sneered at the theory, claiming that it was nothing more than that. A theory that has no practical application in actual life. Mr. Thorpe, on the other hand, began to play little and discovered that his theory was true. He was consistently profitable at blackjack, thanks to his card counting skills. It wasn't long before his book became a best seller. The casinos became enraged and began ejecting persons who were clearly winning and counting cards from their establishments. Although card counting is not against the law, casinos have the right to refuse to allow a player on their premises. However, what the casinos did not realise at the time was that their revenues were exploding as a result of the large number of players who were aware of the idea but were unable or unable to execute the card counting procedure.
The system, after all, functions well; therefore, card counters should be employed in some capacity. After all, logic has shown that the cards will eventually fall in a player's favour, and in the long term, playing blackjack can result in substantial gains. Of course not; it is absurd for individuals to believe that card counting is a legitimate way to get a few extra dollars. Not everyone has the financial resources, technical expertise, and patience necessary to be successful in card counting. The majority of individuals would be better off not even attempting this.
This card counting system, in my perspective, is no different than the WWDB, BWW, LTD, N21, or other Amway systems that I am familiar with. For starters, card counting is a tried-and-true method of gambling. The Amway systems, on the other hand, are not. However, it can be compared to the banking system in that only a small number of people are able to use the system and make it operate. Even though hundreds of thousands of people may attempt it, only a small percentage will be successful in both Amway and card counting. Those who do not succeed in any of the "systems" stand to lose thousands of dollars. Even in the best-case scenario, doing the right thing can result in losses in either system.
It is "possible" to be successful in both systems, although it is extremely unlikely in either. It is just impossible for the vast majority of individuals to make the systems function for them because they lack the necessary information, skills, and talents. In order to be a long-term success, you'll also need some money, some patience, and a little bit of luck. Rather than comparing the Amway systems to gambling, this article is concerned on a person's capacity to make the system work. The difference is that no one promotes card counting as a legitimate means of making money these days. The same may be said with Amway and their systems, as well. In terms of making money, this is a bad system.
0 comments: